Today the European Commission adopted the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield, i.e. an adequacy decision to allow the transfer of personal data from the EU to the U.S.
This new agreement replaces the Safe Harbor Agreement, which was based on the Commission Decision 2000/520/EC of 26 July 2000 pursuant to Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the adequacy of the protection provided by the safe harbour privacy principles and related frequently asked questions issued by the US Department of Commerce (OJ 2000 L 215, p. 7).
The Safe Harber Agreement was declared invalid by the CJEU in the Case C-362/14 Maximillian Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner. See Press Release 6.10.2015. Therefore, it had to be renogotiated and so was, the EU – US Privacy Shield scheme adopted.
The European Digital Rights organization has qualified this agreement as a privacy sham ! See here
It follows the Press release of the EU Commission:
European Commission – Press release |
European Commission launches EU-U.S. Privacy Shield: stronger protection for transatlantic data flows
- Strong obligations on companies handling data: under the new arrangement, the U.S. Department of Commerce will conductregular updates and reviews of participating companies, to ensure that companies follow the rules they submitted themselves to. If companies do not comply in practice they face sanctions and removal from the list. The tightening of conditions for the onward transfers of data to third parties will guarantee the same level of protection in case of a transfer from a Privacy Shield company.
- Clear safeguards and transparency obligations on U.S. government access: The US has given the EU assurance that the access of public authorities for law enforcement and national security is subject to clear limitations, safeguards and oversight mechanisms. Everyone in the EU will, also for the first time, benefit from redress mechanisms in this area. The U.S. has ruled out indiscriminate mass surveillance on personal data transferred to the US under the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield arrangement. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence further clarified that bulk collection of data could only be used under specific preconditions and needs to be as targeted and focused as possible. It details the safeguards in place for the use of data under such exceptional circumstances. The U.S. Secretary of State has established a redress possibility in the area of national intelligence for Europeans through anOmbudsperson mechanism within the Department of State.
- Effective protection of individual rights: Any citizen who considers that their data has been misused under the Privacy Shield scheme will benefit from several accessible and affordable dispute resolution mechanisms. Ideally, the complaint will be resolved by the company itself; or free of charge Alternative Dispute resolution (ADR) solutions will be offered. Individuals can also go to theirnational Data Protection Authorities, who will work with the Federal Trade Commission to ensure that complaints by EU citizens are investigated and resolved. If a case is not resolved by any of the other means, as a last resort there will be anarbitration mechanism. Redress possibility in the area of national security for EU citizens’ will be handled by an Ombudspersonindependent from the US intelligence services.
- Annual joint review mechanism: the mechanism will monitor the functioning of the Privacy Shield, including the commitments and assurance as regards access to data for law enforcement and national security purposes. The European Commission and the U.S. Department of Commerce will conduct the review and associate national intelligence experts from the U.S. and European Data Protection Authorities. The Commission will draw on all other sources of information available and will issue a public report to the European Parliament and the Council.
Add a Comment